|
Surface Design Journal Spring 2005
Editorial: The Body: Subject and Object
It's
a gray morning in early February, and
I'm taking a break from the struggle to write this editorial. The mail has come, and I'm
happy to find a hand-addressed envelope among the catalogs and bills. Ripping the envelope
open, I pull out a photocopied image of a wedding dress arranged in a seductive position-there's no message but a
title, Memory and Desire.* It's a Valentine made by an artist, and just the inspiration I need. Suggesting the evocative
power of clothing as an independent entity, the image affirms an aspect of what this issue is about.
Since the Journal regularly features artists using surface
design for clothing, we decided to focus the issue not only on wearable objects but also on the prevalent
trend of using clothing as a subject for sculpture and installation art. So, what follows traces a continuum
ranging from clothing as fashion to clothing as conceptual content for art. Reaching across the spectrum
is concern for the body, whether as a living armature for cloth constructions or a virtual presence inhabiting
self-sufficient garment-like forms.
At its best, straightforward clothing design balances functionality
and expression. Regardless of how their silhouettes may depart from the actual lines of the body, successful
garments are attuned to bodily proportions and movement. As for expression, there is no doubt that luxurious
clothes like those designed by Marian Clayden (see pages 18-23) would bring drama into any room they might
enter. However, quietly elegant apparel such as one of Jane Sisco's dresses (pages 12-17) also makes a strong
statement. Even the simplest, most unassuming clothes reflect the personalities of designers and wearers,
the lifestyles they are meant to support, the cultural climates and seasons in which they emerge.
But the garment's relation to the actual body is just the
beginning. Clothing has a voice that extends beyond the life of its wearer. Think of vintage clothes in attics
and thrift shops that speak movingly of past times and purposes. Or the haunting enigma of a fugitive glove
in the middle of a highway. At some point, a garment's role as outward manifestation of a person becomes
that of witness to corporeal existence.
Many artists who are neither fashion designers nor specialists
in fiber have become aware of the eloquence of clothing in its own right. Through researching what covers
the body, they have uncovered meanings implicit in dress. Numerous artists, for example, have found that
traditional wedding gowns and the rituals surrounding them provide rich resources for creative exploration.
Examining what is normally private, other artists have realized that undergarments can be potent symbols
of public attitudes. The gender-specific Victorian corset, for example, is laden with cultural information
and associations. Artists' deconstructions/reconstructions of corsets have brought forth significant social
commentary.
As always, the artists and works represented here are only
a sampling of a critical mass. The rest is all out there for you to discover.

* Martha Posner, an artist whose work was the subject of an article in SDJ (Spring 1998) by Hildreth York, made
the Valentine.
|